Philologos
Bible Prophecy Research
Title: Iyyar/Sivan, 5763 (May/June, 2003)
Submitted by: research-bpr@philologos.org
URL:
http://philologos.org/bpr/files/Jewish_Feasts/sivan.htm
Iyyar/Sivan, 5763 (May/June, 2003)
(Please keep in mind that Jewish dates begin on the evening before.
This is a work in progress and will be updated as needed.
Very simple grid of May and June suitable for printing.)
Iyyar, 5763 (May, 2003)1 Sivan (June 1, 2003) Rosh Chodesh Sivan/New Moon for month of Sivan
June 3, 1922 British White Paper (please see 6,7 Sivan)
1 Sivan (June 1, 2003) Rosh Chodesh Sivan/New Moon
2 Sivan (June 2, 2003) Yom HaMeyuchas/Day of the Noble
2 Sivan (June 2, 2003) Bush to Egypt for Arab Summit
SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt, June 2 (Reuters) - U.S.
President George W. Bush arrived in Egypt on Monday for a
summit with Arab leaders to seek their support for the
U.S-backed "road map" intended to end the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict.
Bush, on his first presidential visit to the Middle East, will meet
leaders from Egypt, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, as well
as the Palestinian prime minister Mahmoud Abbas, in the Red
Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh on Tuesday.
After talks in Egypt, Bush will travel to a landmark summit with
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his Palestinian
counterpart Mahmoud Abbas.
(http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L0281098.htm)
Saudi Sources: Normalization With Israel Issue Caused 24-Hour Crisis With US
GMP20030605000055 London Al-Sharq al-Awsat in Arabic 05 Jun 03 p1 [Report by
Abd-al-Latif al-Minawi in Sharm al-Shaykh: "Twenty Four Crisis Between Saudi
Arabia and United States Almost Caused Prince Abdallah's Withdrawal From
Sharm al-Shaykh"]
[With thanks to www.mideastweb.org/mewnews1.htm ]
[FBIS Translated Text] Informed sources have revealed that relations between
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United States went through a 24-hour
crisis at the Sharm al-Shaykh summit that almost caused Saudi Crown Prince
Abdallah Bin-Abd-al-Aziz to pull out from the summit's closing session.
The sources said US President George Bush resolved the problem that revolved
around a paragraph on normalization with Israel that was included in the
proposed final statement. They added that the US President asserted his
positive position and told his aides to delete the paragraph causing the
dispute and said he was willing to go personally to Prince Abdallah to
persuade him to attend.
Sources in the Saudi delegation said they appreciate the US President's
position and understanding of the crown prince's view.
The crisis revolved around a paragraph that the US delegation included and
which declared the summit conferees' agreement on normalization as part of
what was called confidence-building steps between the Arab and Israeli
sides. The US delegation at the negotiations that were held at the
ministerial level insisted on not deleting the paragraph. A Saudi source
said Prince Abdallah was informed and he in turn insisted on rejecting it
and said the Saudi delegation would leave Sharm al-Shaykh if the paragraph
was not deleted and therefore would not take part in the final statement.
Regarding the US delegation's justifications, the source said they
considered it necessary for supporting the negotiations later but the Saudi
side presented a written document that the Saudi Government had sent last
month explaining its position that rejects normalization.
Saudi Ambassador in Washington Prince Bandar Bin-Sultan handed the document
to the White House, which clearly stated the three conditions stipulated at
the Beirut summit -- the ending of all the occupation, the refugees' right
to return, and Jerusalem as the Palestinians' capital -- after which
recognition would be made once these conditions have been met.
On his part, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Sa'ud al-Faysal said they [the
Arabs] value highly President Bush's position and appreciate his personal
commitment to achieving peace.
[Description of Source: London Al-Sharq al-Awsat in Arabic -- Influential
Saudi-owned London daily providing independent coverage of Arab and
international issues; editorials reflect official Saudi views on foreign
policy]
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
3,4,5 Sivan (June 3,4,5, 2003) Shloshes Yemai Hagbalah/Three Days of Limitation
4 Sivan, 5763 (June 4, 2003) Bush, Sharon, Abbas "Peace" Summit in Jordan
Israel Government Press Office Wednesday, June 04, 2003
Israeli Statement
(04/06/2003)
I would like to thank His Majesty King Abdullah for arranging this meeting,
and express Israel's appreciation to President Bush for coming here to be
with Prime Minister Abbas and me. Thank you.
As the Prime Minister of Israel, the land which is the cradle of the Jewish
people, my paramount responsibility is the security of the people of Israel
and of the State of Israel. There can be no compromise with terror and
Israel, together with all free nations, will continue fighting terrorism
until its final defeat.
Ultimately, permanent security requires peace and permanent peace can only
be obtained through security, and there is now hope of a new opportunity for
peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Israel, like others, has lent its strong support for President Bush's
vision, expressed on June 24, 2002, of two states - Israel and a Palestinian
state - living side by side in peace and security. The Government and people
of Israel welcome the opportunity to renew direct negotiations according to
the steps of the roadmap as adopted by the Israeli government to achieve
this vision.
It is in Israel's interest not to govern the Palestinians but for the
Palestinians to govern themselves in their own state. A democratic
Palestinian state fully at peace with Israel will promote the long-term
security and well-being of Israel as a Jewish state.
There can be no peace, however, without the abandonment and elimination of
terrorism, violence, and incitement. We will work alongside the Palestinians
and other states to fight terrorism, violence and incitement of all kinds.
As all parties perform their obligations, we will seek to restore normal
Palestinian life, improve the humanitarian situation, rebuild trust, and
promote progress toward the President's vision. We will act in a manner that
respects the dignity as well as the human rights of all people.
We can also reassure our Palestinian partners that we understand the
importance of territorial contiguity in the West Bank, for a viable,
Palestinian state. Israeli policy in the territories that are subject to
direct negotiations with the Palestinians will reflect this fact.
We accept the principle that no unilateral actions by any party can prejudge
the outcome of our negotiations.
In regard to the unauthorized outposts, I want to reitirate that Israel is a
society governed by the rule of law. Thus, we will immediately begin to
remove unauthorized outposts.
Israel seeks peace with all its Arab neighbors. Israel is prepared to
negotiate in good faith wherever there are partners. As normal relations are
established, I am confident that they will find in Israel a neighbor and a
people committed to comprehensive peace and prosperity for all the peoples
of the region.
Thank you all.
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
The Aqaba Summit - Sharon, Bush, Abdullah, Abbas - has ended, bringing hope
to some, and trepidation to others that once again Israel will pay a heavy
price in exchange for nothing. "Today may very well be registered in
history as the 'naqba' - the day of catastrophe - for Israel," said MK Dr.
Aryeh Eldad (National Union).
Following morning meetings between Sharon/Bush, Sharon/Abdullah, and
Bush/Abbas, the leaders of the three main parties to the current diplomatic
process - Bush, Sharon, and Abbas - sat together for the actual summit
meeting. Afterwards, each of them delivered their "historic"
declarations. Hamas spokesman Mahmoud A-Zahar said later that the
declarations made at the summit are "a declaration of war on the
Palestinian nation [sic];" see below.
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon made several points, namely:
Excerpts:
"Israel, like others, has lent its strong support for President Bush's
vision, expressed on June 24, 2002, of two states - Israel and a
Palestinian state - living side by side in peace and security...
"It is in Israel's interest not to govern the Palestinians, but for the
Palestinians to govern themselves in their own state. A democratic
Palestinian state fully at peace with Israel will promote the long-term
security and well-being of Israel as a Jewish state.
"There can be no peace, however, without the abandonment and elimination
of terrorism, violence, and incitement. We will work alongside the
Palestinians and other states to fight terrorism, violence and incitement
of all kinds. As all parties perform their obligations, we will seek to
restore normal Palestinian life, improve the humanitarian situation,
rebuild trust, and promote progress toward the President's vision…
"We can also reassure our Palestinian partners that we understand the
importance of territorial contiguity in the West Bank, for a viable,
Palestinian state. Israeli policy in the territories that are subject to
direct negotiations with the Palestinians will reflect this fact.
"We accept the principle that no unilateral actions by any party [ed.
note: understood to mean "settlements"] can prejudge the outcome of our
negotiations.
"In regard to the unauthorized outposts, I want to reiterate that Israel
is a society governed by the rule of law. Thus, we will immediately begin
to remove unauthorized outposts…"
Abbas, who served as treasurer of Fatah and doled out the money for many
terrorist attacks over the course of several decades, said that terrorism
is "inconsistent with our religious and moral traditions."
He also equated between Palestinian and Jewish suffering throughout
history; said he would "end the militarization of the intifada;" promised
to allow weapons only in the hands of those "who are in charge of upholding
law and order;" and promised to "act vigorously against incitement and
violence and hatred." Excerpts, as published by CNN:
"Just as Israel must meet its responsibilities, we, the Palestinians, will
fulfill our obligations for this endeavor to succeed. We are ready to do
our part. Let me be very clear: There will be no military solution for this
conflict, so we repeat our renunciation and the renunciation of terrorism
against the Israelis wherever they might be. Such methods are inconsistent
with our religious and moral traditions… We will exert all of our efforts
using all our resources to end the militarization of the intifada and we
will succeed. The armed intifada must end, and we must use and resort to
peaceful means in our quest to end the occupation and the suffering of
Palestinians and Israelis.
"And to establish the Palestinian state, we emphasize our determination to
implement our pledges which we have made for our people and the
international community, and that is the rule of law, single political
authority, weapons only in the hands of those who are in charge of
upholding the law and order, and political diversity within the framework
of democracy.
"Our goal is clear and we will implement it firmly and without compromise:
a complete end to violence and terrorism...
"We will also act vigorously against incitement and violence and hatred,
whatever their form or forum may be. We will take measures to ensure that
there is not incitement emanating from Palestinian institutions. We must
also reactivate and invigorate the U.S.-Palestinian-Israeli anti-incitement
committee."
He then ticked off the responsibilities of each side:
"As I said yesterday, the issue of settlements must be addressed for peace
to be achieved. In addition, Prime Minister Sharon has stated that no
unilateral actions by either side can or should prejudge the outcome of
future negotiations. The prime minister also recognizes that it is in
Israel's own interest for Palestinians to govern themselves in their own
state…
"Prime Minister Abbas… has pledged to consolidate Palestinian
institutions, including the security forces, and to make them more
accountable and more democratic. He has promised his full efforts and
resources to end the armed intifada. He has promised to work without
compromise for a complete end of violence and terror… Both prime ministers
here agree that progress toward peace also requires an end to violence and
the elimination of all forms of hatred, and prejudice and official
incitement, in school books, in broadcasts and in the words used by
political leaders. Both leaders understand that a future of peace cannot be
founded on hatred and falsehood and bitterness.
"…My government will provide training and support for a new, restructured
Palestinian security service. And we'll place a mission on the ground, led
by Ambassador John Wolf. This mission will be charged with helping the
parties to move toward peace, monitoring their progress and stating clearly
who is fulfilling their responsibilities…
"I've also asked Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security
Adviser Condoleezza Rice to make this cause a matter of the highest
priority. Secretary Powell and Dr. Rice, as my personal representative,
will work closely with the parties, helping them move toward true peace as
quickly as possible…"
Arutz Sheva News Service
Aaron Lerner Date: 4 June 2003
While Israel Radio reported that while the streets of Aqaba are decorated
today with the flags of Jordan, U.S. and the PLO/PA, Jordan declined to put
Israeli flags in the streets.
Amir Weiss, the spokesman of the Israeli Embassy in Amman, took an upbeat
tone in an interview on Israel Radio, noting that Israeli flags were inside
the king's palace in Aqaba for the meeting.
At 9:47 AM Israel Radio pointed out it is becoming embarrassing that the
Jordanians have yet to permit the Israeli flag to be displayed at the press
center.
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
The Yesha Rabbis Council issued a strong statement last night, following
the Aqaba summit, saying that "secular Zionism has completed its task, and
it is now the turn of 'believing Zionism' to take over." The Council also
criticized the General Security Service for its warning that Yesha
residents might fire on security forces who come to evacuate them. "Do
they have 'thought police?'" asked the Council.
Arutz Sheva News Service
5 Sivan, 5763 (June 5, 2003) Last living signatory of Israel's Declaration of Independence dies
By Joseph Algazy
Meir Vilner, the last living signatory of Israel's
Declaration of Independence, died Thursday morning
at the age of 84. Vilner served as leader of the
Israeli Communist Party (and subsequently Hadash)
and was its representative in the Knesset for some
40 years.
Born in Vilnius in 1918, Vilner
studied at the Hebrew gymnasium
Tarbut. In his youth, he was a
member of the Hashomer Ha'tzair
movement. In 1938, he
immigrated to Israel to study
at Hebrew University in
Jerusalem. In 1940, he joined
the communist party in Israel,
which was underground, and for
many years was a member of the party leadership.
From 1965-1990, he served as secretary-general of
the Israel Communist Party and was its chairman
from 1990-1993.
In a statement released Thursday, his family said
Vilner saw his work as his greatest achievement,
through which he and his colleagues successfully
created a unique political movement in which they
lived and fought, Jews and Arabs together, for a
just peace, for equal rights for the Arab
population and for the defense of workers' rights
in Israel.
Vilner championed a Marxist-Leninist ideology, to
which he remained true throughout the upheavals
that shook the world in recent years. He
maintained his political ideology even when it
was deemed unacceptable and not easily discussed
in Israel.
In 1967, Vilner survived an assassination attempt
by a member of Herut - a right-wing political
movement that evolved into today's Likud party.
He was stabbed at the height of an incitement
campaign that targeted Vilner and his political
party for their call to end the occupation and
recognize the Palestinian right to a homeland
alongside Israel.
He died in hospital, where he had spent the last
four years.
June 5, 1967 Start of Six Day War
INTRODUCTION
On 15 May 1967, Israel celebrated its 19th Day of Independence.
The celebrations were attuned to a minor key. The economy had
not yet recovered from a recession that had afflicted it the year
before. Tension on the border with Syria had risen incessantly,
sabotage was being committed in Israel's territory by terrorists
from across the lines, settlements were being shelled by Syrian
guns entrenched on the Golan Heights. The Soviet press waged a
propaganda campaign against Israel, accusing it of aggressive
designs against Syria.
During the Independence Day parade in Jerusalem, Israel's
Government heard from the Chief of Staff the first news of large
Egyptian troop movements, begun the previous day, in the
direction of the Suez Canal and the Sinai peninsula (Document 1).
There was, at first, an inclination to believe that the movements
were no more than a propagandistic show. Egypt's fortunes at that
time were at a low ebb. It was still entangled in the Yemen war,
with little success, and consequently suffered from loss of
prestige. Its relations with some of its Arab sister-States had
deteriorated, those with Saudi Arabia were near the breaking point,
those with Tunisia and Morocco strained, Jordan was considered
an enemy (in a speech on 1 May Nasser had called King Hussein
an 'agent and slave of the imperialists'). Syria indicted Egypt as not
living up to its obligations as an ally. The Israelis did not yet know
that the Soviet Union was urging Egypt to take an active stand
alongside Syria against what was described as an impending
Israeli aggression against Syria. On 13 May a Soviet parliamentary
delegation visited Cairo and informed the Egyptian leaders that
Israel had concentrated eleven to thirteen brigades along the
Syrian border in preparation for an assault within a few days, with
the intention of overthrowing the revolutionary Syrian Government.
Similar information may have been given to Egypt by the Soviets
somewhat earlier. There was, of course, not a grain of truth in the
story, as the Soviets knew very well. The Egyptians were in a
position to know it, too, in view of the authoritative denial issued by
Secretary-General U Thant a few days afterwards. Later, U Thant
reported that UNTSO observers "have verified the absence of
troop concentrations and absence of noteworthy military
movements on both sides of the [Syrian] line". But Nasser
probably understood the Soviet information as a hint that the Soviet
Union was persuaded that timing and circumstances were
propitious for an assault on Israel, and obviously felt obliged to
abandon the cautious policy that he had till then pursued and
assume the leadership of the Arab campaign.
If Israel's leaders still told themselves on 15 May that there was no
imminent danger of war, they were soon to be undeceived. On 16
May Radio Cairo declared: "The existence of Israel has continued
too long. We welcome the Israeli aggression we welcome the
battle we have long awaited. The peak hour has come. The battle
has come in which we shall destroy Israel." On that day, Egypt
asked for the withdrawal of the UN Emergency Force from Sinai
and the Gaza Strip. U Thant acquiesced on the night of 18-19 May
in what many considered unwarranted haste. Israel asserted that
his precipitate compliance ran contrary to an express undertaking
by his predecessor in 1957 (see Section IX, Document 35). UNEF
ceased its functions on 19 May (Document 2). On the same day,
Israel decided on partial mobilization, but was still hopeful that a
dangerous escalation could be averted by stepped-up diplomatic
efforts. It was indicative of this state of mind that, also the same
day, President Zalman Shazar flew to Canada for a long-planned
State visit, and that on 21 May Finland's Premier, Kustun Passio,
was welcomed on a State visit to Israel. At the opening of the
summer session of the Knesset on 22 May Prime Minister Eshkol
emphasized Syrian aggression and incitement and called for a
lessening of tension and the preservation of peace (Document 3).
In the meantime, unprecedented military escalation had taken
place on the Egyptian border. By 20 May Nasser had massed over
80,000 men and about 900 tanks in Sinai, facing Israel. In the early
morning hours of 23 May while U Thant was on his way to Cairo as
a peace-maker, the world learned that Nasser had proclaimed the
closure of the Straits of Tiran to Israeli and Israel-bound shipping
some hours before. He was fully aware that Israel regarded the
closure as an act of aggression justifying Israel's invocation of the
right of self-defence. It was his declared aim to force Israel into
action that would trigger off full-scale war. Speaking to Egyptian
trade unionists on 26 May, he declared: "The battle will be a
general one and our basic objective will be to destroy Israel"
(Document 7). With the UNEF departed, Egypt planned to resume
fidayun operations from the Gaza Strip against and into Israel.
After more than ten years of repose, Israel's villages in the vicinity
of the Egyptian border had, once more, to suffer shelling and
mines. War frenzy swept Egypt and almost the entire Arab world.
Nasser was at the zenith of his popularity, the hero of battle who
would lead the Arabs to victory. On 29 May he delivered a speech
proclaiming that he would erase the Arab defeat of 1948
(Document 8). On 30 May, King Hussein of Jordan visited Cairo
unexpectedly, committed himself to take part in the war that
loomed and placed his forces Under an Egyptian commander,
General Riad. Iraq followed suit. During a visit to Moscow, Egypt's
War Minister was assured of Soviet support by Prime Minister
Kosygin.
On 24 May, the Security Council met, at the insistence of Canada
and Denmark, to discuss the situation in the Middle East. The
representatives of the Soviet Union and Bulgaria maintained that
there was no reason for a discussion. After fruitless talks, the
Council adjourned on 3 June; it had reached no decision
(Document 10).
Foreign Minister Eban left Jerusalem on 24 May for Paris, London
and Washington, to alert the Western leaders to the critical
situation and seek of them action in accordance with their
declarations ten years earlier, when Israel withdrew its forces from
Sharm el-Sheikh and the Gaza Strip. In Paris, Eban found a
completely changed situation. President de Gaulle suggested that
the Big Four should work together for a de-escalation of the
tension and decide on a solution to the questions of navigation
through the Straits, the problem of the Arab refugees and the
"conditions of proximity of the interested States". He urged that
Israel should not be the first to open fire. Eban's protestations that
Egypt had already started aggression were in vain. A statement in
similar terms to the utterances of de Gaulle was issued on 2 June
by the Council of Ministers of France (Document 11), and, on the
following day, by the French representative in the Security Council
(Document 10). It became apparent that France, which only three
years earlier had hailed Israel as "friend and ally", had switched
sides. On 3 June, it imposed an arms embargo on the Middle
East, but in reality only Israel was affected.
President Lyndon Johnson and Prime Minister Harold Wilson
assured the Israeli Foreign Minister of their support for free
passage through the Straits of Tiran and the Gulf of Aqaba, but
added that they needed some time to enlist the participation of
other States and to assure the necessary approval by Congress
and Parliament. The Foreign Minister returned to Jerusalem on the
evening of 27 May. After a long and anxious session, the
Government decided to give further chances to diplomatic efforts
to prevent war. But, within a few more days, it was considered that
there were no chances of resolving the crisis by international
action. While a sympathetic but passive world watched Israel in its
most perilous hour, Israel finished mobilization and prepared for
the worst eventuality. On I June, the two major opposition parties,
Gahal and Rafi, joined the Government coalition in a Government
of National Unity. Lieutenant-General Moshe. Dayan (Rafi), Chief of
Staff during the Sinai campaign, replaced Levi Eshkol as Minister
of Defence, and Gahal leaders Menachem Begin and Yosef Sapir
became Ministers without portfolio. On 4 June, the Cabinet
authorized the Prime Minister and the Minister of Defence to
decide on appropriate steps to defend the State (Document 12).
On the following morning, 5 June, the Israel Air Force attacked
Arab air forces and airfields and destroyed 400 enemy aircraft in
Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Iraq, most of them on the ground. The
Egyptian air force was virtually destroyed in a lightning action
lasting less than three hours. At the same time, the Israel Defence
Forces moved against the Egyptian columns massed in Sinai. The
Southern Command, composed of three divisions, faced seven
Egyptian divisions and about 1,000 Egyptian tanks. In four days of
battle, including one of the largest battles in the history of
armoured warfare, Israel occupied the entire Sinai peninsula and
the Gaza Strip, reached the eastern bank of the Suez Canal and
opened the Straits of Tiran. On 8 June, Egypt accepted a
cease-fire and, that evening, fighting ceased in Sinai.
On the morning of 5 June, Prime Minister Eshkol had, through the
Chief of Staff of UNTSO, General Odd Bull, despatched a
message to King Hussein of Jordan, urging him to refrain from
joining the war (Document 16). The message was not answered,
but, in the later hours of the forenoon, Jordan opened fire along the
entire armistice line with Israel, shelling Jerusalem with especial
violence. At noon, Jordanian soldiers occupied the United Nations
headquarters. In the afternoon, Israel opened its counterattack,
and two days later, after swift fighting, had taken the Old City of
Jerusalem and the entire West Bank. On the evening of 7 June,
Jordan accepted the cease-fire and fighting stopped.
Syria had taken part in the fighting with planes and artillery,
continuously shelling Israeli villages near the border and attacking
some of them with infantry and armour. At noon on 9 June, the
Israel Defence Forces, now freed from other fronts, attacked the
Syrian army entrenched on the Golan Heights. In fierce righting
during that and the following day, they stormed the Heights and
occupied the town of Kuneitra on the afternoon of 10 June. At 1630
GMT, a cease-fire became effective on the Israel-Syrian front.
The Six-Day War was over. Israel's casualties amounted to 759
dead and about 3,000 wounded. Arab casualties came to about
15,000. Israel, delivered from the peril to its very existence, was
now determined not to move from the new cease-fire lines until
permanent peace was established (Document 23).
The Security Council, inert and ineffectual during the emergency
that preceded the war, had met each day of the fighting, its main
concern to arrange a cease-fire (Documents 20, 21, 22). On 13
June, the Soviet Union having broken off diplomatic relations with
Israel three days previously, followed by Bulgaria, Poland,
Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Guinea, asked that a
special emergency session of the General Assembly be
convened. The Assembly was addressed on 19 June by Soviet
Premier Kosygin, who called for condemnation of Israel,
withdrawal of its forces from all areas occupied in the war, and
payment of compensation by Israel for damage inflicted on Egypt,
Syria and Jordan (Document 24). His address was answered by
Israel's Foreign Minister (Document 25). The discussion in the
Assembly then centred on a number of draft Resolutions
(Documents 27-30) and lasted for a month. On 21 July, the
session adjourned: the Assembly had decided nothing and
referred the issue back to the Security Council. The Council, after
long discussions, on 22 November unanimously adopted
Resolution 242, which became the basis for future United Nations
policymaking on the Middle East conflict (Document 32).
The Arab States did not listen to Israel's call for peace.
Encouraged by the Soviet Union, which embarked on the
rebuilding of their shattered armies, they resolved, at a summit
meeting in Khartoum between 29 August and 1 September, upon a
policy of three nays: no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel,
no negotiations with Israel (Document 31). Israel advocated direct
negotiations between the parties, without prior conditions, aimed at
the conclusion of binding peace agreements. Until peace was
made, the Israel Defence Forces would be deployed on the new
cease-fire lines, and the areas occupied in the Six-Day War would
be administered by an Israeli Military Government. Jerusalem was
reunified at the end of June, and the whole city was thus brought
under Israeli law (see Section IV).
6,7 Sivan (June 6,7, 2003) Shavuot/Pentecost (6th Israel, 6th and 7th Diaspora).
The Midrash says that the people slept on the night before the giving of the Torah and Hashem had to wake them up in the morning. To rectify this, they stay up all night in anticipation.
7 Sivan (June 3, 1922) British White Paper
7,8 Sivan (June 7,8, 2003) Isru Chag/Bind the Festival (on the 7th for Israel, on the 8th for Diaspora)
(
http://headcoverings-by-devorah.com/OrachChayim/HebglossI.html)
Dear Rabbi,
Dear Michael Braitman,
The same is true of a Festival. We don't go directly from a joyous festival back into
everyday life. We need a day to "warm-down," or rather to "wrap-up" the joy of the
Holiday. "Isru chag" is that day. "Isru chag" literally means "tie up the festival." That is,
take the happiness and meaningfulness of the festival and bring it with you into the rest
of the year.
In Temple times, festive offerings were brought on isru chag of the Shavuot Festival.
Isru chag remains a semi-festive day, even today when there is no Temple.
Sources:
Shulchan Aruch 429:2
8 Sivan, 5763 (June 8, 2003) US Observers to Israel (Wolf sent to guard sheep?)
By Aluf Benn, Arnon Regular and Nadav
Shragai
A U.S. team, under the leadership of envoy
John
Wolf, is expected to arrive in the area today or
tomorrow to begin observing the
implementation of
the road map by both the Palestinian Authority
and
Israel.
The group will include State
Department and Central
Intelligence Agency officials.
Their immediate aim will be to
ensure that the PA puts an end
to terrorism while Israel keeps
its commitment to evacuate
illegal outposts in the West
Bank.
...
With their declared commitment to the road
map,
and under the aegis of the United States, the
two
warring sides - Israel and the Palestinians -
embarked at the end of Wednesday's Aqaba
summit
on efforts to come to terms with opposition
forces inside their respective camps.
Late in the week, representatives of Sharon
and
Mofaz met with leaders of the Yesha Council
of
Settlements in an effort to jointly form a list
of outposts that would be evacuated, some
possibly voluntarily by the settlers.
For their part, Palestinian sources close to
Abbas
said that contacts with the radical Islamic
group
Hamas were ongoing, despite reports that
there
was a break in communication as a result of
the
Palestinian Authority's stance on the road map.
The meetings between Yesha and government
representatives were held in spite of the initial
reluctance of the settlers to carry out any form
of negotiations on the removal of outposts.
However, there was concern the Defense
Ministry
would include in its list of outposts to be
removed ones that had been in place for some
time, so it was decided to seek terms that
would
include mostly empty or sparsely populated
outposts.
According to reports, Sharon is personally
involved in the formation of the list of outposts
that will be removed as part of the road map.
Right-wing circles are certain the evacuation of
outposts will begin this week. For his part,
Mofaz ordered his office to draw up a list of
outposts that are blatantly in violation of the
law.
In the coming days, Mofaz is scheduled to
meet
with leaders of the Yesha Council in order to
convince them to evacuate 12 outposts
considered
"marginal." At the Prime Minister's Office and
at
the Israel Defense Forces it is still hoped that
the settlers will agree to dismantle the outposts
on their own accord and avoid clashes with
the
army.
Frustrated Palestinian officials harshly
criticized Hamas yesterday, saying the group's
decision to pull out of talks aimed at ending
attacks against Israelis could torpedo the road
map peace plan just as it was getting off the
ground.
...
9 Sivan, 5763 (June 9, 2003) Pluto at Opposition (see Pluto and Chiron/Pluto Conjunction files)
Quotes from Talmud taken from The Soncino Talmud CD-ROM, Davka Corp. 1991-1995.
After the exodus, on the 1st of Sivan, G-d instructed Moses to tell the nation, "You shall be a kingdom of ministers and a holy nation." On the 2nd of Sivan, Moses delivered this message and charged Israel with its new noble status. And so that day is called Yom HaMeyuchas, "Day of the Noble." (Mesorah Heritage Foundation)
Website: www.imra.org.il
For three daysthe 3rd, 4th and 5th of SivanIsrael stood at the foot of Mount Sinai anticipating the Giving of the Torah on Shavuos. These days are called Shloshes Yemai Hagbalah,"Three Days of Limitation," and are celebrated as quasi-festivals. (Mesorah Heritage Foundation)
Website: www.imra.org.il
"As the Prime Minister of Israel, the land which is the cradle of the
Jewish people, my paramount responsibility is the security of the people of
Israel and of the State of Israel. There can be no compromise with terror
and Israel, together with all free nations, will continue fighting
terrorism until its final defeat. Ultimately, permanent security requires
peace and permanent peace can only be obtained through security, and there
is now hope of a new opportunity for peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
The PA's Abbas recognized Israel's right to exist, but did not specify "as
a Jewish state" - meaning that he did not make any concessions on the
'right of return' of Arab refugees to Israel. He similarly did not promise
to dismantle the terrorist infrastructures, but sufficed with a commitment
to "end the armed uprising."
"…Our goal is two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in
peace and security. The process is the one of direct negotiations to end
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and to resolve all the permanent status
issues and end the occupation that began in 1967 under which Palestinians
have suffered so much. At the same time, we do not ignore the suffering of
the Jews throughout history. It is time to bring all this suffering to an end.
U.S. President George Bush, speaking last, began by saying that America,
and he personally, are "strongly committed to Israel's security as a
vibrant Jewish state." Bush said that the summit participants all "share a
goal: The Holy Land must be shared between the state of Palestine and the
state of Israel, living at peace with each and with every nation of the
Middle East."
"I welcome Prime Minister Sharon's pledge to improve the humanitarian
situation in the Palestinian areas and to begin removing unauthorized
outposts immediately. I appreciate his gestures of reconciliation on behalf
of prisoners and their families, and his fine statements about the need for
territorial contiguity.
http://www.IsraelNationalNews.com
Wednesday, June 4, 2003 / Sivan 4, 5763
Website: www.imra.org.il
http://www.IsraelNationalNews.com
Thursday, June 5, 2003 / Sivan 5, 5763
Meir Vilner dies at 84
XI. THE SIX-DAY WAR
Traditionally, Shavuot is the day that King David was born, and died.
The first official manifesto interpreting the Balfour Declaration, it was
issued on June 3, 1922, after the 1921 disturbances. Although the White Paper stated that the
Balfour Declaration could not be amended and that the Jews were in Palestine by right, it reduced
the area of the Mandate by excluding the area east of the Jordan River, which was given to the
Emir Abdullah. This document also established the principle of "economic absorptive capacity" as
a factor for determining the immigration quota of Jews to Palestine.
(White Papers)
The day following the three pilgrim
festivals (Pesach, Shavuot and
Sukkot) is known as Isru Chag
(bind the festival), with reference to
Tehillim 118:27. It is observed as a
semi-festive day, when the
Tachanun supplications are
omitted from the Shacharit
(morning) and Minchah
(afternoon) services. In Temple
times, Isru Chag was the day
when the pilgrims left Yerushalayim
for their homes. According to a
talmudic statement, he who
observes Isru Chag as a festive
day with eating and drinking is as if
he offered sacrifices upon the
Mizbeach (Altar) (Sukkah 25b)
What's the significance of "isru chag" (the day after a festival)? Why is
there no school (in Israel, at least) on isru-chag? A friend said it has
something to do with the fact that there was an extra day for people to
bring a korban (Temple offering) during the festival, in case they couldn't
make it to Jerusalem on time. If so, why is this pertinent to our day, when
there are no sacrifices?
Ever go jogging? When you're done, you're not supposed to stop suddenly; it's too big
of a shock to the system. Rather, you "warm-down" by walking, and finally you can stop.
Succah 45b
Jerusalem Talmud, Avodah Zarah 1:5
U.S. observers due, as Abbas talks with
Hamas leadership
Opposition:
The position of a planet when it is exactly opposite the Sun as seen from Earth. A planet at opposition is at
its closest approach to the Earth and is best suitable for observing.
(Sea & Sky: Glossary of Astronomy Terms)
Quotes from Midrash Rabbah taken from The Soncino Midrash Rabbah CD-ROM, Davka Corp. 1992-1995.
BPR Home | Research Files | Jewish Calendar | Reference Guide | Online Books | Search | About Us
|